Occupy Wall Street

"Wall occupy Street" has many unprepared, not only domestically, but also world's captive. It almost seems like some stupid kids were spending (about five minutes) global news much too much time and realized what has happened in the Middle East. Since the early Arab almost all countries of the region experienced a form of change good or bad time will tell. Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, have overthrown Governments, Syria Jordan has seen in the edge of civil war, their cabinet, faster than a Hollywood marriage changed. It was only obliged to happen here. Social media orchestrated the Arab movements and movements in Tibet and the Mongolia. Same Facebook, Twitter, YouTube will now be used in these "Occupied" movements. It started half heartedly, but is fully supported wholeheartedly the majority of people. Many have pointed out this as the "tea party of links". But I think that those who point this 'occupiers' are problems of the left, right and Center. Now the question is, can be large enough, push to the policy change? This is something, what we have to wait and see.

Who would generally support or sympathy for them. Their anger is against the architects of the financial crisis 2008-Wall Street. This average hard-working middle-class people were injured, when they saw vaporizes their livelihoods and Wall Street bonuses and CEO retirement parachutes always to newer heights. People understood, however, that may rescue operations were required. But what has happened since then is this motion purely out of frustration. She by and oppose of the increases in taxes on the rich from the right has angered and many injured. Seventy-five percent, including Republicans, believe that the rich should pay their fair share. How you would measure the "fair share" that is up to debate, but if a page in the discussion is not even ready to talk about, then it's pretty obvious fail. The demonstrators nearly the London of the student movement where car threw eggs at Prince Charles students reminded me. It is education loans costs and student again. I can tell you from personal experience; It seems almost like a curse for graduates of the College with student loans. The whole generation would drown in debt before entering the labour market. The incentives to innovator with 100 K-student loans is much less now, always a Wall Street Manager. Obama meet loan reforms, but this reform with students still on paper. As long as not real reform in the application continue to this kind of protests for a while.

The education and poverty alleviation in Spanish and Latino community is far gloomier then the overall picture. With ethnic diversified bag population forces increasing day by day poverty of more these children out of school and on the streets. The unemployment rate is 9.1%, but the majority of companies would tell you that they can find enough skilled workers. The lack of skilled workers is not only because children are all on Facebook or bored, simply can't afford it, get the help of the school. Siemens is working directly with community colleges setup vocational programs to train people. Yet, not many experts received the wrath of these "average joes" on Wall Street.

The idea that "it is difficult, to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in many parts of the country to life" is also a farce. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the average household income in United States has declined over ten years. The official poverty rate is 15.1% in 2010, in section 46.2 million people - most in the 52 years of poverty estimate calculations. In times like these, you will find it think more difficult?

It is not, as they all want is jealous of the wealthy cars, the large villas and Madzaraddi. It is not the case. The nurses, firefighters, teachers, college graduates are frustrated, they all because they have lost their voice in this political mess. They know they were not obliged, for Beverly Hill or Manhattan lifestyle, that is, why to see all reality shows and celebrity gossip. You want just the security of a life in would and ensuring the well-being of their children to live. The President says, "Wall Street has to pay their fair share," but how? In the 2008 people think was the answer to the "how" for Barack, votes, I think they are bleeding too fast and words will not heal.

In a sense, they are similar with the tea party. The political system they came in large numbers with some good points in the beginning, but lost focus very quickly by galvanizing their movement with party policy agenda. At the beginning of tea party warned that Washington and Wall Street are too mixed. And then somehow channelling all this anger and energy went in the direction of Washington and now White House.

This "take Wall Street" movement has the potential to beat the right boards, only if they keep focus and streamline their frustration. On the one hand, it is not 1% and 99% fight. "Only" the top 1% taxation or they tax strongly is not the solution no sense, but if Warren Buffet points out that then he pays his Secretary more taxes, either. This is the time that we are seriously looking for the deficit problem. As the tea party their extreme view do everything to ensure that the expenditure has, I believe, it is time something extreme to the other spectrum which will bring some balance problem. Again, the movement with the Democratic party politics mix may not be the answer, but they are at this point the only legitimate political voice has this movement.

Tags: Business, politics

Source: e-bangladesh.org

Read More on prothom alo dhaka